Skip to main content

Hi everyone šŸ‘‹,

Iā€™m integrating the Public API v2 with Zapier + ChatGPT and have hit a road-block when trying to embed property data in a reservation response. Iā€™d love a sanity-check from the community (or the API team) to see if Iā€™m missing something or if this is a bug.

1 Request Iā€™m sending

Ā 

http

复制

GET /v2/reservations/8bc5e1b9-1b78-4903-8ce9-c92f3a7faadc?include=property Host: public.api.hospitable.com Authorization: Bearer <personalā€accessā€token>

Token scopes

  • reservations:read āœ…

  • properties:read āœ…

(Confirmed in Settings ā†’ API č®æ问.)

2 Expected

Per the docs (ā€œShow Reservationā€ endpoint) the response should contain

Ā 

json

复制

"relationships": { "property": { ... } }, "included": [ { "type": "property", "attributes": { "name": "Loft A302", ... } } ]

3 Actual (200 OK, truncated)

Ā 

json

复制

{ "data": { "id": "8bc5e1b9-1b78-4903-8ce9-c92f3a7faadc", "code": "HMXZTQ5E3Z", "platform": "airbnb", "arrival_date": "2025-06-15", "departure_date": "2025-06-19", "status": "accepted", "conversation_id": "d5f58806-7c17-4d42-8092-5afada8cae75" } }

No relationships.property and no included array at all.

4 What Iā€™ve already checked

Test Result
Same request without include=property Identical response (so the query string is recognised but ignored).
/v2/reservations/{id}?include=guest Guest object does appear in included āœ…
/v2/properties/{property_id} with the same token Returns full property JSON āœ…
Tried two other reservation IDs (Airbnb, status = accepted) Same outcome āŒ
Tools Hoppscotch, Postman, Zapier Custom Request ā€“ all identical.

Ā 

5 Questions

  1. Is include=property currently supported for Airbnb reservations?

  2. Are there additional filters (e.g. fields[properties]) or relationship flags we need to set?

  3. Could this be a recent regression? (Changelog 2025-05-xx mentions webhook updates.)

Happy to provide full response headers or Postman collection exports if that helps reproduce.

Thanks in advance for any insights! šŸ™

Ā 

ā€” [wang yan]
Ā Chiang Mai, TH

Itā€™s include=properties

not property.

Ā 

const url = 'https://public.api.hospitable.com/v2/reservations/drsdsrgsfdg-83d0-1eb8f494783a?include=properties';
const options = {
  method: 'GET',
  headers: {
    'Content-Type': '',
    Accept: 'application/json',
    Authorization: 'Bearer .ghgdfghsf'
  }
};

try {
  const response = await fetch(url, options);
  const data = await response.json();
  console.log(data);
} catch (error) {
  console.error(error);
}

Hope it helped.Ā 

Also, my question to the dev team: why "properties"? Shouldnā€™t it be "property" šŸ™„? Isnā€™t it a one-to-one relationship? Is it just to make the format consistent?
Ā 

ā€‹@MahmodulĀ Great question. I think was just to align it with listings. As a reservation can actually be associated to multiple listings ( inĀ  the case of Booking.com multi-listing reservation )

But you are right and all those listings would be the same property so we are only ever going to return one property!Ā 

Terms & ConditionsCookie settingsAccessibility statement