Skip to main content
Solved

include=property not returned in /reservations response (v2 API)

W
New Participant

Hi everyone 👋,

I’m integrating the Public API v2 with Zapier + ChatGPT and have hit a road-block when trying to embed property data in a reservation response. I’d love a sanity-check from the community (or the API team) to see if I’m missing something or if this is a bug.

1 Request I’m sending

 

http

复制

GET /v2/reservations/8bc5e1b9-1b78-4903-8ce9-c92f3a7faadc?include=property Host: public.api.hospitable.com Authorization: Bearer <personal‐access‐token>

Token scopes

  • reservations:read ✅

  • properties:read ✅

(Confirmed in Settings → API 访问.)

2 Expected

Per the docs (“Show Reservation” endpoint) the response should contain

 

json

复制

"relationships": { "property": { ... } }, "included": [ { "type": "property", "attributes": { "name": "Loft A302", ... } } ]

3 Actual (200 OK, truncated)

 

json

复制

{ "data": { "id": "8bc5e1b9-1b78-4903-8ce9-c92f3a7faadc", "code": "HMXZTQ5E3Z", "platform": "airbnb", "arrival_date": "2025-06-15", "departure_date": "2025-06-19", "status": "accepted", "conversation_id": "d5f58806-7c17-4d42-8092-5afada8cae75" } }

No relationships.property and no included array at all.

4 What I’ve already checked

Test Result
Same request without include=property Identical response (so the query string is recognised but ignored).
/v2/reservations/{id}?include=guest Guest object does appear in included ✅
/v2/properties/{property_id} with the same token Returns full property JSON ✅
Tried two other reservation IDs (Airbnb, status = accepted) Same outcome ❌
Tools Hoppscotch, Postman, Zapier Custom Request – all identical.

 

5 Questions

  1. Is include=property currently supported for Airbnb reservations?

  2. Are there additional filters (e.g. fields[properties]) or relationship flags we need to set?

  3. Could this be a recent regression? (Changelog 2025-05-xx mentions webhook updates.)

Happy to provide full response headers or Postman collection exports if that helps reproduce.

Thanks in advance for any insights! 🙏

 

— [wang yan]
 Chiang Mai, TH

Best answer by Mahmodul

It’s include=properties

not property.

 

const url = 'https://public.api.hospitable.com/v2/reservations/drsdsrgsfdg-83d0-1eb8f494783a?include=properties';
const options = {
  method: 'GET',
  headers: {
    'Content-Type': '',
    Accept: 'application/json',
    Authorization: 'Bearer .ghgdfghsf'
  }
};

try {
  const response = await fetch(url, options);
  const data = await response.json();
  console.log(data);
} catch (error) {
  console.error(error);
}

Hope it helped. 

View original
    Did this topic help you find an answer to your question?

    3 replies

    Mahmodul
    Top Contributor
    Forum|alt.badge.img+1
    • Mahmodul
    • Top Contributor
    • 68 replies
    • Answer
    • June 14, 2025

    It’s include=properties

    not property.

     

    const url = 'https://public.api.hospitable.com/v2/reservations/drsdsrgsfdg-83d0-1eb8f494783a?include=properties';
const options = {
  method: 'GET',
  headers: {
    'Content-Type': '',
    Accept: 'application/json',
    Authorization: 'Bearer .ghgdfghsf'
  }
};

try {
  const response = await fetch(url, options);
  const data = await response.json();
  console.log(data);
} catch (error) {
  console.error(error);
}

    Hope it helped. 

    The Neighborhood Host
    Luke Renfrew
    W
    2 people like this
    • Luke Renfrew
      Luke Renfrew
    • W
      wang yan
    Mahmodul
    Top Contributor
    Forum|alt.badge.img+1
    • Mahmodul
    • Top Contributor
    • 68 replies
    • June 14, 2025

    Also, my question to the dev team: why "properties"? Shouldn’t it be "property" 🙄? Isn’t it a one-to-one relationship? Is it just to make the format consistent?
     

    The Neighborhood Host
    Luke Renfrew
    Hospitable Team Member
    Forum|alt.badge.img
    • Luke RenfrewHospitable Team Member
    • Hospitable Team Member
    • 4 replies
    • June 15, 2025

    ​@Mahmodul Great question. I think was just to align it with listings. As a reservation can actually be associated to multiple listings ( in  the case of Booking.com multi-listing reservation )

    But you are right and all those listings would be the same property so we are only ever going to return one property! 

    Mahmodul
    1 person likes this
    • Mahmodul
      Mahmodul

    Reply


    Terms & ConditionsCookie settingsAccessibility statement

    Cookie policy

    We use cookies to enhance and personalize your experience. If you accept you agree to our full cookie policy. Learn more about our cookies.

     
    Cookie settings